Told I needed a knee replacement. Six months later I'm playing golf again.
What we can show you.
Not what we claim.
Three patient arcs, charted end-to-end. The peer-reviewed literature we actually read. And the inquiries our physicians turn away. Look at all three before you decide.
Before. Treatment.
6 months later.
Three composite patient arcs, one per persona we see most often. Each shows baseline, protocol, and measurable change at the follow-up endpoint for that case. Partial results are included, not hidden. Real named accounts coming soon.
I didn't come in broken. I came in ahead of the curve. They spent half the consult telling me what they wouldn't promise.
The first conversation that felt honest, and the first treatment that gave me real, measurable ground back.
These three arcs are a sample. Browse the full library by track.
§ Note on names Patient names above are pseudonyms. Details reflect patterns we see most often; identified patient accounts with written consent will replace these as the Patient Stories library comes online.
Inquiries declined after physician screening.
A clinic that accepts every inquiry is optimizing for throughput, not outcomes. We'd rather turn a patient away than take a deposit against a treatment that probably won't change their life.
- 01Structural severity past the realistic ceiling. End-stage collapse, complete ligamentous failure. Surgery is the better conversation.
- 02Expectation mismatch we can't reconcile. A patient who cannot hear the honest version of what this treatment does and doesn't do.
- 03Active medical contraindications. Ongoing malignancy in specific staging, uncontrolled autoimmune activity. Safety, not policy.
Eleven papers. Every one linked.
The peer-reviewed literature our physicians actually read, rated on evidence strength, annotated with where each falls short. Full reading list lives on the Learn page.
-
Well-supported
Knee OA · Meta-analysis
MSC in knee osteoarthritis: systematic review of 8 RCTs
Cui et al. · J Orthop Surg Res · 2025 · n=502 · WOMAC improvement sustained at 6 & 12 months.
-
Well-supported
IV · Safety meta-analysis
Intravascular MSC: pooled safety data
Thompson et al. · EClinicalMedicine · 2020 · dozens of trials pooled · no significant SAE association.
-
Well-supported
GvHD · Phase III
MSC-FFM for steroid-refractory acute GvHD
Bader et al. · Bone Marrow Transplant · 2018 · n=69 · 83% day-28 response. Safety base for the field.
-
Well-supported
IV · ARDS RCT
UC-MSC for COVID-19 ARDS: randomized trial
Lanzoni et al. · Stem Cells Transl Med · 2021 · survival 91% vs 42% · strong IV anti-inflammatory signal.
-
Promising
Knee · UC-MSC dosing
UC-MSC repeated dosing vs HA for knee OA
Matas et al. · Stem Cells Transl Med · 2019 · repeated allogeneic outperformed single-dose and HA at 12 mo.
-
Promising
Shoulder · 36-mo follow-up
Adipose MSC for glenohumeral OA, 3-year data
Natali et al. · J Clin Med · 2023 · among longest follow-up datasets for shoulder-OA cell therapy.
-
Promising
Mechanism · Review
MSC-derived exosomes for cell-free therapy
Phinney & Pittenger · Stem Cells · 2017 · foundational: MSC effects are paracrine, not engraftment.
-
Early / narrow
Neuro · Phase I
Intrathecal MSC-NP in progressive MS, 2-yr
Harris et al. · Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm · 2021 · n=20 · sustained EDSS in a subset. Narrow use only.
-
Early / narrow
Honest limits · Commentary
MSCs: clinical challenges & opportunities
Galipeau & Sensébé · Cell Stem Cell · 2018 · skeptical from the inside. We agree with most of it.
-
Early / narrow
Vetting · Field survey
Selling stem cells in the USA: DTC clinic audit
Turner & Knoepfler · Cell Stem Cell · 2016 · 570+ U.S. businesses · how to tell a real clinic from a bad one.
-
Early / narrow
Regulatory · Review
Global regulatory review for cell therapies
Salmikangas et al. · Molecular Therapy · 2019 · FDA vs EMA vs others · context for "Why Tijuana."
The people standing behind what's on this page.
Every patient arc, every paper on the evidence grid, and every decline decision passes through these three.
Dr. Cesar Amescua, MD
MD, UNAM · 20+ years in regenerative medicine & tissue engineering.
Dr. Rocio Ambrosio Nuño, MD
MD, UABC · Anesthesiology residency, UAS. Interventional procedures & in-suite safety.
Dr. Alejandro Castillo, MD
Biomedical research. Reads the literature and pushes back when the case outruns the evidence.
Proof is general.
A consult is yours.
This page is what we can show everyone. A consult is a physician reading your case, your imaging, and your honest question. No commitment. No pressure.
Book a consult →Not medical advice. Individual results vary. All patients undergo physician screening before any treatment is recommended. Cell therapies at Celva Bio are regulated by COFEPRIS in Mexico; most are not FDA-approved products in the United States.