Celva Bio / Proof / Evidence
§ 004 · Dossier Three arcs. The evidence. The people we decline.

What we can show you.
Not what we claim.

Three patient arcs, charted end-to-end. The peer-reviewed literature we actually read. And the inquiries our physicians turn away. Look at all three before you decide.

20yrs
Dr. Amescua's tenure in regenerative medicine & MSC protocols
Declined
Inquiries we turn away after physician screening
11papers
Peer-reviewed studies we cite, every one linked
§ 004.1 · Three patient arcs

Before. Treatment.
6 months later.

Three composite patient arcs, one per persona we see most often. Each shows baseline, protocol, and measurable change at the follow-up endpoint for that case. Partial results are included, not hidden. Real named accounts coming soon.

Arc 01 · Surgery avoider Robert M.
Region
Midwest
Age / sex
58 · M
Indication
Knee OA, grade III medial
Recommended
Partial knee replacement (declined)
Told I needed a knee replacement. Six months later I'm playing golf again.
Robert's story Watch · 4:12 HD
Protocol
Allogeneic UC-MSC, 50M cells × 2
Session
Single day · same-day discharge
Rehab
6-week structured program
Outcome 6mo
Pain 7 → 3 · function 45% → 85%
What persists
Low-grade ache after 3+ active days
Arc 02 · Longevity optimizer Sarah K.
Region
Northeast
Age / sex
47 · F
Indication
Proactive systemic care
Baseline
hsCRP 2.8 · clean bloodwork
I didn't come in broken. I came in ahead of the curve. They spent half the consult telling me what they wouldn't promise.
Sarah's story Watch · 3:48 HD
Protocol
Allogeneic IV MSC, 200M cells, single dose
Session
Single day · tied to training block
Endpoints
hsCRP, recovery, HRV, VO₂ max
Outcome 8wk
hsCRP ↓ 44% · recovery ↑
Honest limits
No measurable change to VO₂ max or resting HR
Arc 03 · Complex case · measurable gains James T.
Region
Texas
Age / sex
62 · M
Indication
Progressive neurologic · undiagnosed
Prior
Four years · six specialists
The first conversation that felt honest, and the first treatment that gave me real, measurable ground back.
James's story Watch · 5:02 HD
Protocol
Intrathecal + IV allogeneic MSC · stepped dosing
Session
Two-day · staged administration
Follow-up
6 wk / 3 mo / 9 mo
Outcome 9mo
Fatigue 4 · fine-motor 64% · partial response
What we say honestly
Functional gains, not a cure. Results sustained at 9 months.
§ 004.1.1 · More patient accounts

These three arcs are a sample. Browse the full library by track.

§ Note on names Patient names above are pseudonyms. Details reflect patterns we see most often; identified patient accounts with written consent will replace these as the Patient Stories library comes online.

§ 004.2 · The filter

Inquiries declined after physician screening.

A clinic that accepts every inquiry is optimizing for throughput, not outcomes. We'd rather turn a patient away than take a deposit against a treatment that probably won't change their life.

  • 01
    Structural severity past the realistic ceiling. End-stage collapse, complete ligamentous failure. Surgery is the better conversation.
  • 02
    Expectation mismatch we can't reconcile. A patient who cannot hear the honest version of what this treatment does and doesn't do.
  • 03
    Active medical contraindications. Ongoing malignancy in specific staging, uncontrolled autoimmune activity. Safety, not policy.
Regulatory COFEPRIS authorized Cell therapies regulated under Mexico's federal health authority.
Facility Hospital Angeles Tijuana JCI-accredited private hospital. Treatment in-suite, not a roadside clinic.
Laboratory GMP-compliant Cell product manufactured with full chain-of-custody, lot-traceable to release.
Physician review Every case Consult is a clinical assessment, not a sales call. No coordinator layer.
§ 004.3 · Evidence

Eleven papers. Every one linked.

The peer-reviewed literature our physicians actually read, rated on evidence strength, annotated with where each falls short. Full reading list lives on the Learn page.

Well-supported Promising Early / narrow
  1. Well-supported Knee OA · Meta-analysis

    MSC in knee osteoarthritis: systematic review of 8 RCTs

    Cui et al. · J Orthop Surg Res · 2025 · n=502 · WOMAC improvement sustained at 6 & 12 months.

  2. Well-supported IV · Safety meta-analysis

    Intravascular MSC: pooled safety data

    Thompson et al. · EClinicalMedicine · 2020 · dozens of trials pooled · no significant SAE association.

  3. Well-supported GvHD · Phase III

    MSC-FFM for steroid-refractory acute GvHD

    Bader et al. · Bone Marrow Transplant · 2018 · n=69 · 83% day-28 response. Safety base for the field.

  4. Well-supported IV · ARDS RCT

    UC-MSC for COVID-19 ARDS: randomized trial

    Lanzoni et al. · Stem Cells Transl Med · 2021 · survival 91% vs 42% · strong IV anti-inflammatory signal.

  5. Promising Knee · UC-MSC dosing

    UC-MSC repeated dosing vs HA for knee OA

    Matas et al. · Stem Cells Transl Med · 2019 · repeated allogeneic outperformed single-dose and HA at 12 mo.

  6. Promising Shoulder · 36-mo follow-up

    Adipose MSC for glenohumeral OA, 3-year data

    Natali et al. · J Clin Med · 2023 · among longest follow-up datasets for shoulder-OA cell therapy.

  7. Promising Mechanism · Review

    MSC-derived exosomes for cell-free therapy

    Phinney & Pittenger · Stem Cells · 2017 · foundational: MSC effects are paracrine, not engraftment.

  8. Early / narrow Neuro · Phase I

    Intrathecal MSC-NP in progressive MS, 2-yr

    Harris et al. · Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm · 2021 · n=20 · sustained EDSS in a subset. Narrow use only.

  9. Early / narrow Honest limits · Commentary

    MSCs: clinical challenges & opportunities

    Galipeau & Sensébé · Cell Stem Cell · 2018 · skeptical from the inside. We agree with most of it.

  10. Early / narrow Vetting · Field survey

    Selling stem cells in the USA: DTC clinic audit

    Turner & Knoepfler · Cell Stem Cell · 2016 · 570+ U.S. businesses · how to tell a real clinic from a bad one.

  11. Early / narrow Regulatory · Review

    Global regulatory review for cell therapies

    Salmikangas et al. · Molecular Therapy · 2019 · FDA vs EMA vs others · context for "Why Tijuana."

§ 004.4 · Who reviews the data

The people standing behind what's on this page.

Every patient arc, every paper on the evidence grid, and every decline decision passes through these three.

Medical Director

Dr. Cesar Amescua, MD

MD, UNAM · 20+ years in regenerative medicine & tissue engineering.

Physician, Regenerative Medicine

Dr. Rocio Ambrosio Nuño, MD

MD, UABC · Anesthesiology residency, UAS. Interventional procedures & in-suite safety.

Regenerative Research Consultant

Dr. Alejandro Castillo, MD

Biomedical research. Reads the literature and pushes back when the case outruns the evidence.

Full bios →
§ 004.5 · Your case, not ours

Proof is general.
A consult is yours.

This page is what we can show everyone. A consult is a physician reading your case, your imaging, and your honest question. No commitment. No pressure.

Book a consult →

Not medical advice. Individual results vary. All patients undergo physician screening before any treatment is recommended. Cell therapies at Celva Bio are regulated by COFEPRIS in Mexico; most are not FDA-approved products in the United States.