Celva Bio/ Neurologic/ Who is a fit
§ 001 · Neurologic candidacy

Most people
are not a fit.

Neurologic MSC therapy is an evaluation-first program. We decline more cases than we treat. The honest filter is here before you fly, before you pay, and before hope gets in front of evidence.

Accept rate
44%

About half of inquiries are declined with reasons and, where appropriate, a referral.

What we look for
Plausibility + evidence

Indication with biologic plausibility, imaging that matches, and realistic expectations.

What we avoid
Hope-selling

We do not enroll families in expensive therapy when the biologic case isn't there.

§ 002 · The honest position

Why we're
slow here.

Neurologic disease varies enormously in mechanism, time course, and biologic targetability. MSC therapy has genuine case reports and reasonable rationale in narrow indications, and genuinely no business being offered in broad ones.

The families most likely to reach us have already heard every version of hope and every version of no. Our job isn't to add another "maybe." It's to read the case honestly and say yes, no, or not yet, with reasons.

If your case has a plausible indication and reasonable imaging, we'll evaluate carefully. If it doesn't, we'll decline and tell you why.

What we won't do

We don't market "stem cells for Alzheimer's" or "stem cells for autism." Those positions exist in the regenerative industry, and they are not where the biology lands. We'll be direct about what we don't treat.

§ 003 · Candidate profiles

Where the biology
can reach.

Profile 01

Peripheral neuropathy

Diabetic, chemotherapy-induced, or idiopathic peripheral neuropathy with preserved nerve structure on imaging.

  • Imaging confirmed
  • Established diagnosis
  • Reasonable expectations
Profile 02

Select post-injury cases

Post-concussion syndrome, select post-stroke recovery, and certain post-surgical neurologic residuals, case-by-case only.

  • Time from event matters
  • Imaging review essential
  • Decline more than we accept
Profile 03

Autoimmune-adjacent

Select cases with demonstrated inflammatory component where systemic immunomodulation has rationale.

  • Documented inflammatory markers
  • Prior therapy trials documented
  • Realistic goals
Profile 04

ALS, palliative intent

Early-to-mid ALS, accepted for quality-of-life support only. We are explicit up front: this is palliative, not disease-modifying. MSC therapy does not cure ALS.

  • Early-to-mid stage only
  • Quality-of-life goals
  • Co-management with treating neurologist
§ 004 · Decline profiles

What we
decline.

Declining cases is how we stay honest. Families with these profiles are frequently told "yes" by clinics outside the United States. Some of those clinics are well-intentioned. Many aren't. The outcomes, broadly, do not support the optimism.

Decline 01

Neurodegenerative disease (late stage)

Late-stage ALS, Parkinson's, Huntington's, and similar with significant structural loss. The biology cannot reach what's gone. Early-to-mid ALS is considered separately for quality-of-life support only, see candidate profiles.

Decline 02

Autism spectrum disorder

No biologic rationale. We do not offer MSC therapy for autism. Any clinic doing so is outside the science.

Decline 03

Dementia & Alzheimer's

Systemic MSC therapy has not shown meaningful disease modification in dementia. We decline these cases.

Decline 04

Pediatric cerebral palsy

Structural neurologic injury in a developing brain is not a case where current MSC therapy has demonstrated durable benefit.

§ 005 · Evaluation process

How a neurologic
case is evaluated.

01 / Intake

Written submission

Diagnosis, imaging, medication history, prior therapy trials, goals. Submitted in writing before any call.

02 / Read

Physician review

Attending reviews the written submission and imaging against established neurologic criteria. Decision may land here.

03 / Call

Conversation

If the profile merits further evaluation, an extended call with the physician. Questions both ways.

04 / Decision

Accept, decline, or defer

Accept with a written plan. Decline with reasons and referrals where appropriate. Defer pending additional imaging or trials.

§ 006 · Questions

Candidacy
questions.

Q.01My neurologist said stem cells won't help. Why submit anyway?
Often your neurologist is right. If you want an honest second read, we'll give one. Many of our declines confirm what a neurologist already said, and families leave with a clearer answer.
Q.02Why decline cases other clinics accept?
Because the biologic case isn't there. A yes from another clinic doesn't make the biology work. We're structured to say what's true, not what's marketable.
Q.03Is there any version of stem cell therapy that helps my condition?
For some conditions, active clinical trials are enrolling. We can sometimes point you to those. For others, the honest answer is not yet. Either is more useful than a yes we can't defend.
§ 008 · Start here

Submit for
honest evaluation.

The written intake is the first filter. It's slow by design, the purpose is to decide well, not to fill a schedule.

Request an evaluation →
Not medical advice. Neurologic candidacy undergoes extensive screening. Most inquiries result in a decline with reasons.